| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:35:18 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031007041246.13aa0391.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20031007034051.3fcb3218.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200310071116.PAA30760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031007041246.13aa0391.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20031007041246.13aa0391.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 7 Oct 2003 04:12:46 -0700), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:16:20 +0400 (MSD) > kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > Actually, this does not depend on our implementation. If people implement > > a MIB, required precision of these times is prescribed in the rfc. > > And this is definitely not jiffies. > > Right, Shirley what is it? The type is TimeTicks (RFC2578) via TimeStamp (RFC2579). Thus, uint32_t counter in 1/100 sec. unit. --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fw: Re: [PATCH] ipv4 tcp autobind problem, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable, Shirley Ma |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |