| To: | Xose Vazquez Perez <xose@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] pci.ids for e1000 |
| From: | Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:32:51 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3F621965.4070106@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3F621965.4070106@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:07:17PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > The general idea is to keep 2.4, 2.6, and pciids.sf.net in sync. > > is there sync between 2.4, 2.6, and pciids.sf.net ? ;-) > > Linus and Marcelo should not accept patches against pci.ids, > all updates should go to pciids.sf.net. And every X time > to do a sync with 2.4 and 2.6. I'd love to see a volunteer to try to sync these files up and routinely send updates to the pci maintainers of the different kernel trees. Anyone? I also agree with David, it's completly acceptable for drivers to add their ids to this file when they are added to the kernel tree. thanks, greg k-h |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] (0/16) intro to IRDA patches for 2.6.0-test6, Jean Tourrilhes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [irda-users] Re: [PATCH] (0/16) intro to IRDA patches for 2.6.0-test6, Martin Diehl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] pci.ids for e1000, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] lksctp 0.6.9 backport on 2.4.23-pre3, MORANGE,DAMIEN (HP-France,ex1) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |