netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6

To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 03:01:53 -0700
Cc: bunk@xxxxxxxxx, acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, lksctp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1064916168.21551.105.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030928225941.GW15338@xxxxxxxxx> <20030928231842.GE1039@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030928232403.GX15338@xxxxxxxxx> <20030929220916.19c9c90d.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1064903562.6154.160.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030930000302.3e1bf8bb.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1064907572.21551.31.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030930010855.095c2c35.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1064910398.21551.41.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030930013025.697c786e.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1064911360.21551.49.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030930015125.5de36d97.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1064913241.21551.69.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030930022410.08c5649c.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1064916168.21551.105.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:02:49 +0100
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am saying that even if I run 'make all', I do not accept that the
> resulting kernel image should be _different_ when I change any option
> from 'n' to 'm'.

Then let's agree to disagree.

Send the proposal to Linus and let him hash it out with you, although
I belive I have a good idea which side of the fence he'll be on. 8-)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>