| To: | Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, lksctp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6 |
| From: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:47:58 -0300 |
| In-reply-to: | <20030928233909.GG1039@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, lksctp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Conectiva S.A. |
| References: | <20030928225941.GW15338@xxxxxxxxx> <20030928231842.GE1039@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030928232403.GX15338@xxxxxxxxx> <20030928233909.GG1039@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
Em Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 08:39:10PM -0300, Arnaldo C. Melo escreveu: > Simply removing the ifdefs in the headers will not help, leaving it in the > kernel will bloat general purpose kernels, so can we live with this limitation s/leaving it in the kernel/making it always statically linked in the kernel if selected/g Sorry... - Arnaldo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, Adrian Bunk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, Adrian Bunk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |