| To: | Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6 |
| From: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:18:42 -0300 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, lksctp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030928225941.GW15338@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, lksctp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Conectiva S.A. |
| References: | <20030928225941.GW15338@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
Em Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:59:41AM +0200, Adrian Bunk escreveu: > It seems modular IPv6 doesn't work 100% reliable, e.g. after looking at > the code it doesn't seem to be a good idea to compile a kernel without > IPv6 support and later build and install IPv6 modules. Is there a great > need for modular IPv6 or is the patch below to disallow modular IPv6 OK? Please, don't... We're going in the all modules direction, not the other way around, distro (general purpose) kernels would get big bloat in the static kernel. - Arnaldo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, Adrian Bunk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, Adrian Bunk |
| Previous by Thread: | RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, Adrian Bunk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6, Adrian Bunk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |