netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Patch]: IPv6 Connection Tracking

To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Patch]: IPv6 Connection Tracking
From: Andras Kis-Szabo <kisza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Sep 2003 21:07:18 +0200
Cc: Netfilter Devel <netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309252151180.11253-100000@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: SecurityAudit
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309252151180.11253-100000@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

> What I fear is that in the end, nothing gets done because having the goal
> set to perfection.  If there is no energy to drive through the
> L3-independent connecting tracking, the end result is that the user does
> not have this feature (remember ip6tables REJECT target?  That must have
> been sitting in netfilter for some 2+ years, and not having been
> integrated in the mainline kernel and the users still do not have the
> feature!).
I have felt the same on Brad Chapman's port. That code has lost in time
:(

> > Your FTP code uses EPSV and EPRT from rfc2428. What's about the FOOBAR
> > RFC (1639)? OK, it's a joke :)
> > Could we open an IPv4 data connection next to the IPv6 controll
> > connection?
> What about LPRT and LPSV?
This is the rfc1639/foobar :)

Regards,

kisza

-- 
    Andras Kis-Szabo       Security Development, Design and Audit
-------------------------/        Zorp, NetFilter and IPv6
 kisza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx /------------------------------------------->


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>