netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxx

from [chas williams] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx)
From: chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:55:07 -0400
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> of "Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:07:50 BST." <20030922180749.A26432@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
In message <20030922180749.A26432@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Christoph Hellwig writes:
>Umm, shouldn't you just ifdef out the whole function and it's
>assignment to the operations vector?  This looks horribly ugly..

i suppose i am not convinced that two #ifdef/#endif's are better than an
#if/#else/#endif
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), Christoph Hellwig
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]