Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxx

netdev

To:	chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx)
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:07:50 +0100
Cc:	davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200309221703.h8MH3tkT009109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:03:57PM -0400
References:	<200309221703.h8MH3tkT009109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.2.5.1i

Umm, shouldn't you just ifdef out the whole function and it's
assignment to the operations vector?  This looks horribly ugly..

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), chas williams Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), Christoph Hellwig <= Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), chas williams Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), Mitchell Blank Jr Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), David S. Miller Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), chas williams

Previous by Date:	[PATCH][ATM]: update link in documentation, chas williams
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), chas williams
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), chas williams
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@xxxxxxxxxx), chas williams
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]