| To: | Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c alignment problems on parisc64 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:39:09 -0700 |
| Cc: | acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, lksctp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309191440320.4758-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030918195525.28c17cb1.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309191440320.4758-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 15:15:53 -0700 (PDT) Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But unfortunately i am not able see this problem with a parisc64 cross > compiler > on i386. So it makes it hard to debug or fix it. Looks like this happens only > when building natively on a parisc64 machine which i don't have access to. Did you build with or without SMP enabled? Anyways, try to work with Arnaldo to figure out the precise statement causing the problems. > Also while reviewing the code in sctp_pack_cookie(), i noticed a structure > copy. Are structure copies portable across all the archictectures? Should we > replace it with a memcpy? Yes, structure copies are portable. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: patricia tries vs. hash for routing?, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] tcp_diag.c -- use static,const,void, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c alignment problems on parisc64, Sridhar Samudrala |
| Next by Thread: | Re: net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c alignment problems on parisc64, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |