| To: | Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: O/M flags for 2.4.22 (was "Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1") |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:19:21 -0700 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309121537430.1445-100000@linux-udp12861866uds> |
| References: | <20030911192507.0b3f2633.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309121537430.1445-100000@linux-udp12861866uds> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm happy to apply a 2.4.x version as well. > > Patch against 2.4.22 follows. I applied the 2.6.x version, but this 2.4.x version does not apply cleanly, there are a bunch of rejects. That's not surprising since there's been, as there always is, several networking updates in 2.4.x since 2.4.22 already which cause conflicts with your patch. Please always, and I mean always, create patches against the most recent possible version of 2.4.x or 2.6.x. We'll never have to go back and forth like this if you do that. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] proc_net macro's for non-proc-fs case, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] lksctp 0.6.9 backport on 2.4.23-pre3, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | O/M flags for 2.4.22 (was "Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1"), Krishna Kumar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: O/M flags for 2.4.22 (was "Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1"), Krishna Kumar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |