| To: | Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:25:07 -0700 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3F58D567.2050201@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030730220223.4c25fcfe.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307311330200.27478-100000@DYN318430> <20030804165746.133f370a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3F58D567.2050201@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 11:26:47 -0700 Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Otherwise I am OK with the patch. > > OK, should I fix these two bugs and re-submit against test4 kernel ? > > Dave, I would like to get the prefix list and O/M flags information included > in 2.4 kernel too, are you OK with that ? Yes, rebuild the patch against current 2.6.x and yes I'm happy to apply a 2.4.x version as well. Also, thank you for explaining how the message embedding works. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH][ATM] a few patches from John Levon, chas williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [e1000 2.6 10/11] TxDescriptors -> 1024 default, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, Krishna Kumar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, Krishna Kumar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |