| To: | Ricardo C Gonzalez <ricardoz@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [e1000 2.6 10/11] TxDescriptors -> 1024 default |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:00:27 -0400 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <OFAFA77EE1.3E4E4085-ON85256D9E.00777520-86256D9E.0077947E@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | none |
| References: | <OFAFA77EE1.3E4E4085-ON85256D9E.00777520-86256D9E.0077947E@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk |
Ricardo C Gonzalez wrote: IP transmit is black hole that may drop packets at any moment, any datagram application not prepared for this should be prepared for troubles or choose to move over to something like TCP.As I said before, please do not make this a UDP issue. The data I sent out was taken using a TCP_STREAM test case. Please review it. Your own words say "CPUs can fill TX queue". We already know this. CPUs have been doing wire speed for ages.
Jeff
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: New IPv6 Draft Implementation, Marcin Kaminski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [e1000 2.6 10/11] TxDescriptors -> 1024 default, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [e1000 2.6 10/11] TxDescriptors -> 1024 default, Ricardo C Gonzalez |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [e1000 2.6 10/11] TxDescriptors -> 1024 default, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |