Re: [PATCH] (1/8) add probe_old

netdev

Re: [PATCH] (1/8) add probe_old_netdevs hook

To:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] (1/8) add probe_old_netdevs hook
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 3 Sep 2003 20:41:50 -0700
Cc:	shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<3F568C88.4030303@xxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20030903164908.14705874.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <3F568C88.4030303@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 20:51:20 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> All the patches except for #3 look ok to me.
> 
> David?

I feel the same, the probe ordering in #3 is unacceptable
and has to be undone.

I'll apply all the other patches except that one.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [PATCH] (1/8) add probe_old_netdevs hook, Jeff Garzik Re: [PATCH] (1/8) add probe_old_netdevs hook, David S. Miller <= Re: [PATCH] (1/8) add probe_old_netdevs hook, Stephen Hemminger Re: [PATCH] (1/8) add probe_old_netdevs hook, David S. Miller

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0-test4-bk5 - Was: Re: The recent free_netdev() conversion..., David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] (8/8) loopback device simplification, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] (1/8) add probe_old_netdevs hook, Jeff Garzik
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] (1/8) add probe_old_netdevs hook, Stephen Hemminger
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]