Re: [PATCH][ATM] atm_getaddr() isn't safe

netdev

Re: [PATCH][ATM] atm_getaddr() isn't safe

To:	chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH][ATM] atm_getaddr() isn't safe
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 3 Sep 2003 20:24:31 -0700
Cc:	chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200309031625.h83GPFl5022616@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<200309031625.h83GPFl5022616@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:25:16 -0400
chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> this patch also preserves the old behavior of atm_getaddr() in
> that it does partially fill in the passed buffer.  please apply
> to 2.6 and 2.4.

Applied, thanks Chas.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH][ATM] atm_getaddr() isn't safe, chas williams Re: [PATCH][ATM] atm_getaddr() isn't safe, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] remove net/README, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	*Re: /proc/net/ read drops data*, David S. Miller*
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH][ATM] atm_getaddr() isn't safe, chas williams
Next by Thread:	how is recv(..., MSG_PEEK) racy?, Abhijit Menon-Sen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]