Re: Bug in qeth in 2.6

["Cornelia Huck" <COHUCK@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

sorry, I still don't see it...

> 2.4 was like this:
>
>            result = 0;
>            for (all in list) {
>                        if (something)
>                                    result = QETH_VERIFY_IS_SOMETHING;

and it stops here if something...

>            }

... and here follows a second loop over the list, looking for foo().

>
> 2.6 is:
>
>            result = 0;
>            for (all in list) {
>                        result = (something)? QETH_VERIFY_IS_SOMETHING:
foo();

and here it stops if something or foo()...

>            }

...no second loop here.

Since it's either something or foo(), this looks like the same behaviour to
me.

Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen

Cornelia Huck
zLinux Developer
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4837, Mail: cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx