| To: | vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: (5/5) Allow IPv6 tunnels without own IPv6 address |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 01 Sep 2003 11:24:09 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309010257390.26242-200000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309010249070.26242-200000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309010257390.26242-200000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309010257390.26242-200000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 1 Sep 2003 03:11:58 +0300 (EEST)), Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > unless (link-local) protocols like DHCPv6 or MLD are run over the virtual > link formed by IPv6 tunnels, the net_devices representing the tunnels > don't necessarily need to have an IPv6 address configured specifically to > them. Wrong. All interfaces have a link-local address. (RFC2462) --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | So you thought sis190 was evil..., Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Missing routes cause BUG() in icmpv6_xmit_lock()., David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] IPv6: (5/5) Allow IPv6 tunnels without own IPv6 address, Ville Nuorvala |
| Next by Thread: | So you thought sis190 was evil..., Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |