| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Best way to hook incoming eth pkts? |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:15:12 -0400 |
| Cc: | mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030820105437.73dc86db.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030820154727.GB9119@xxxxxxx> <6756.1061401768@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030820175929.GD23984@xxxxxxx> <20030820105437.73dc86db.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:54:37AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:59:29 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 01:49:28PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > > For ethernet protocols, you can just register the protocol handler, and
> > > you
> > > will get them.
> >
> > Dumb question: how? example code, or relevant functions to grep for?
>
> He's talking about net/core/dev.c:dev_add_pack()
Thanks much.
Tangent, from reading dev.c: Is it ok that dev_queue_xmit_nit does not
check the return value of struct packet_type's ->func hook? It seems to
do so in all other cases...
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 2.4] kernel oops on VLAN removal, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [patch][bonding] fix kernel panic when removing the primary slave, Shmulik Hen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Best way to hook incoming eth pkts?, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Best way to hook incoming eth pkts?, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |