| To: | Jason Lunz <lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: double-check me? |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Aug 2003 10:41:19 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <slrnbk1p7n.306.lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3F3FBF50.8070207@xxxxxxxxx> <m3n0e8uhl4.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3F400226.1080006@xxxxxxxxx> <slrnbk1p7n.306.lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:38:50PM +0000, Jason Lunz wrote:
> jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx said:
> > C pointer arithmatic. Ok, duh, thanks :)
> > Jeff, too used to void pointer arith
>
> Don't get _too_ used to it. arithmetic on (void *) is a gcc extension.
> it's undefined in ansi C.
Yes, I know.
It's used extensively in the kernel, however.
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: double-check me?, Jason Lunz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Change MAC without bringing interface down, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: double-check me?, Jason Lunz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: double-check me?, Jason Lunz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |