[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Convert ax25 to seq_file

To: "David S . Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert ax25 to seq_file
From: Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:34:46 +0200
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, linux-hams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030813031159.6c6c9629.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; from davem@xxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 12:11:59 +0200
References: <20030812194653.A28977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030812135655.7334887b.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20030812230951.E28977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030812153901.6e700dcb.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20030813010301.K28977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030812172151.7de0c950.shemminger@xxxxxxxx> <20030813031159.6c6c9629.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 2003.08.13 12:11:59 +0200 David S. Miller wrote:
> I have a bazillion different ax.25 patches in my inbox now,
> some should be applied and others not, and this is hard to
> determine with all the activity.
> Can someone send me a coherent set of patches to apply once
> all the issues have been worked out?

This is my last patch (rxq4) plus Stephen's last three (dev locking,
setsockopt, seq_file)


p.s. Which protocol is a good example of non-linear skb usage? Most still
seem to use skb_linearize() and the skb documentation is somewhat outdated.

Attachment: linux-2.6.0-test3.ax25.diff
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>