| To: | shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:04:14 -0700 |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, laurent.deniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200308121703.15567.shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E791C176A6139242A988ABA8B3D9B38A0251E69F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200308121703.15567.shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 17:03:15 +0300 Shmulik Hen <shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > One of the great things about what Jamal spends his time working > > on is finally a strict seperation of the control layer from > > everything else. And part of this is moving all of the control > > logic into userspace. Once that is accomplished, I can have my > > toilet flush every time a TCP packet is routed through my system > > and this won't crap up the kernel. > > What scope are we talking about here ? > 2.4 ? 2.6 ? 2.7 ? other ? > Our current aim is 2.4 and 2.6. Jamal's work is longer term, I'll let him answer your other questions. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves, Laurent DENIEL |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves, Shmulik Hen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |