[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'

To: shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:04:14 -0700
Cc: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, laurent.deniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200308121703.15567.shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <E791C176A6139242A988ABA8B3D9B38A0251E69F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200308121703.15567.shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 17:03:15 +0300
Shmulik Hen <shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > One of the great things about what Jamal spends his time working
> > on is finally a strict seperation of the control layer from
> > everything else.  And part of this is moving all of the control
> > logic into userspace. Once that is accomplished, I can have my
> > toilet flush every time a TCP packet is routed through my system
> > and this won't crap up the kernel.
> What scope are we talking about here ?
> 2.4 ?  2.6 ?  2.7 ?  other ?
> Our current aim is 2.4 and 2.6.

Jamal's work is longer term, I'll let him answer your other

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>