Re: Fw: [PATCH] set NLM_F_MULTI in answer of RTM

netdev

Re: Fw: [PATCH] set NLM_F_MULTI in answer of RTM_GETADDR dump answer

from [kuznet]

To:	davem@xxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller)
Subject:	Re: Fw: [PATCH] set NLM_F_MULTI in answer of RTM_GETADDR dump answer
From:	kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	Sun, 10 Aug 2003 07:03:48 +0400 (MSD)
Cc:	hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20030809011153.46a99ef2.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> from "David S. Miller" at Aug 09, 2003 01:11:53 AM
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hello!

> After sending RTM_GETADDR dump request to netlink socket, received multipart
> answer does not have NLM_F_MULTI set on each message. This patch fix that.

OK.

Actually, this flag was never used because of its redundancy
it is not the only place where it is not set.

Alexey

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Fw: [PATCH] set NLM_F_MULTI in answer of RTM_GETADDR dump answer, kuznet <= Re: Fw: [PATCH] set NLM_F_MULTI in answer of RTM_GETADDR dump answer, David S. Miller

Previous by Date:	*Re: [PATCH] IPV6: strategy hander for net.ipv6.conf..forwarding (is Re: problem setting net.ipvX.conf.all.forwarding via sysctl() system call)*, David S. Miller*
Next by Date:	Re: Fw: [PATCH] set NLM_F_MULTI in answer of RTM_GETADDR dump answer, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	(no subject), mailperson
Next by Thread:	Re: Fw: [PATCH] set NLM_F_MULTI in answer of RTM_GETADDR dump answer, David S. Miller
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]