netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

[BK PATCH] Minor updates to SCTP

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [BK PATCH] Minor updates to SCTP
From: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Dave,

Please do a
        bk pull http://linux-lksctp.bkbits.net/lksctp-2.5 

to get the following updates to SCTP on top of linux 2.6.0-test2.

# This patch includes the following deltas:
#                  ChangeSet    1.1595  -> 1.1597 
#       net/sctp/associola.c    1.57    -> 1.58   
#           net/sctp/input.c    1.34    -> 1.35   
#       net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c 1.61    -> 1.62   
#       net/sctp/endpointola.c  1.27    -> 1.28   
#       net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c        1.57    -> 1.58   
#       include/net/sctp/constants.h    1.15    -> 1.16   
#           net/sctp/debug.c    1.8     -> 1.9    
#            net/sctp/proc.c    1.6     -> 1.7    
#       include/net/sctp/sm.h   1.26    -> 1.27   
#        net/sctp/protocol.c    1.56    -> 1.57   
#       include/linux/sctp.h    1.6     -> 1.7    
#       net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c        1.47    -> 1.48   
#       net/sctp/sm_statetable.c        1.18    -> 1.19   
#       include/net/sctp/command.h      1.13    -> 1.14   
#       include/net/sctp/structs.h      1.69    -> 1.71   
#          net/sctp/socket.c    1.88    -> 1.89   
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 03/08/04      sri@xxxxxxxxxx  1.1596
# [SCTP] ADDIP basic infrastructure support. (Ardelle.Fan)
# --------------------------------------------
# 03/08/04      sri@xxxxxxxxxx  1.1597
# [SCTP] Fix to avoid large kmalloc failures on 64-bit platforms.
# 
# When spinlock debugging is enabled, the size of assoc hash table and
# port hash table for a fixed value of 4096 entries exceeds the size
# of the largest possible kmalloc() on 64-bit platforms. This problem is
# avoided by using page allocations similar to the methodology followed
# for tcp hash table allocations.
# --------------------------------------------

Thanks
Sridhar


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>