[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Make XFRM optional

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make XFRM optional
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:51:37 -0700
Cc: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030804203524.GA15874@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030804125022.GA8167@averell> <20030804.215801.124854897.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030804130408.GA36367@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030804114507.6e496c77.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030804203524.GA15874@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 4 Aug 2003 22:35:24 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ok, here is a new patch again current BKCVS. It also moves the 
> inet_peer_idlock
> only inside netsyms.

This one is missing net/xfrm/xfrm_export.c :-(

Andi, please be more careful with your patches.  I'd suggest use
subversions or whatever source management system you like best to help
avoid these problems in the future.  You seem to be chronicly making
mistakes like this, as if you're rushing things.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>