Re: [PATCH] Make XFRM optional

["David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 4 Aug 2003 15:04:08 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks for the feedback. Here is a new patch with the two hunks 
> removed.

Still broken in two areas:

1) You moved inet_peer_idlock into net/xfrm/xfrm_exports.c, that
   looks quite wrong.

2) Your patch doesn't apply to Linus's current tree because
   "secpath_dup" got added to net/netsyms.c since 2.6.0-test2 got
   released.

I wanted to merge this, but I can't until you fix the above problems.

Thanks.