| To: | "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: e100 "Ferguson" release |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 03 Aug 2003 02:12:49 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3F2CA65F.8060105@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | none |
| References: | <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E010222927D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3F2CA65F.8060105@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk |
Jeff Garzik wrote: * (extremely minor) some people (like me :)) consider dead reads like the readb() call in e100_write_flush er, that was a bit incomplete. completing:... needing to be marked explicitly with a "(void) " prefix, indicating it is intentionally a dead read. Maintainer's call, ultimately, though... |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6: Incorrect hoplimit in ip6_push_pending_frames(), David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: TOE brain dump, Alan Shih |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: e100 "Ferguson" release, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: e100 "Ferguson" release, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |