[Top] [All Lists]

Re: e100 "Ferguson" release

To: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: e100 "Ferguson" release
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 02:12:49 -0400
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3F2CA65F.8060105@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: none
References: <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E010222927D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3F2CA65F.8060105@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk
Jeff Garzik wrote:
* (extremely minor) some people (like me :)) consider dead reads like the readb() call in e100_write_flush

er, that was a bit incomplete.


... needing to be marked explicitly with a "(void) " prefix, indicating it is intentionally a dead read.

Maintainer's call, ultimately, though...

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>