| To: | "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: e1000 typo? |
| From: | "Jason Lunz" <lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:29:06 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E0102229242@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E0102229242@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:24AM -0700, Feldman, Scott wrote: > It's intentional because && stops evaluating if left op is false which > means we would leave Tx cleanup work when there was no Rx work. ah. subtle yet obvious. :P -- Jason Lunz Reflex Security lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.reflexsecurity.com/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: e1000 typo?, Feldman, Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | netdev_ops retraction, Matthew Wilcox |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: e1000 typo?, Feldman, Scott |
| Next by Thread: | netdev_ops retraction, Matthew Wilcox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |