[Top] [All Lists]

RE: e1000 typo?

To: "Jason Lunz" <lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: e1000 typo?
From: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:24:17 -0700
Cc: <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcNWvvrz6ZMxsjO8S528qn3AP1oZ3QACIglg
Thread-topic: e1000 typo?
> is that intentional? I don't think it changes the code 
> behavior, but it doesn't look right.

It's intentional because && stops evaluating if left op is false which
means we would leave Tx cleanup work when there was no Rx work.  


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>