| To: | Glenn Fowler <gsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kernel bug in socketpair() |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jul 2003 12:14:36 -0700 |
| Cc: | gsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dgk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200307231911.PAA35164@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200307231428.KAA15254@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030723074615.25eea776.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307231656.MAA69129@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030723100043.18d5b025.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307231724.NAA90957@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030723103135.3eac4cd2.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307231814.OAA74344@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030723112307.5b8ae55c.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307231854.OAA90112@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030723120457.206dc02d.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307231911.PAA35164@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:11:47 -0400 (EDT) Glenn Fowler <gsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 12:04:57 -0700 David S. Miller wrote: > > Is bash totally broken because of all this? Or does the problem only > > trigger when using (cmd) subprocesses in a certain way? > > bash uses pipe() so its ok > using socketpair() instead of pipe() introduces the problem > and we will now have to find an alternative to work around the > linux /dev/fd/N implementation I missed the reason why you can't use pipes and bash is able to, what is it? If it's the fchown() thing, why doesn't bash have this issue? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: kernel bug in socketpair(), Alan Cox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: kernel bug in socketpair(), David Korn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: kernel bug in socketpair(), Glenn Fowler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: kernel bug in socketpair(), Glenn Fowler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |