Re: [PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5

netdev

Re: [PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5

To:	chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2003 05:24:16 -0700
Cc:	chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200307162120.h6GLKWsG023003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<200307162120.h6GLKWsG023003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:18:04 -0400
chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> (and how does __inline__ work
> when its the timer function?)

If you take the address of a function marked inline,
gcc outputs a non-inline of the function.

All of your ATM patches applied, thanks Chas.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5, chas williams Re: [PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5, David S. Miller <= Re: [PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5, chas williams

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.5.73, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: Fw: [PATCH][2.6] propogate rx errors from raw_rcv_skb, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5, chas williams
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5, chas williams
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]