| To: | Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.5.73 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 2003 05:17:33 -0700 |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307171716160.9419-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030718.004701.11546819.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307171716160.9419-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ------------------- Patch for prefix list against 2.5.73 ------------
Ok, I tried to apply this, but it had lots of rejects, here
is why.
> diff -ruN linux-2.5.73.org/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> test/linux-2.5.73/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> --- linux-2.5.73.org/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2003-06-22 11:33:17.000000000
> -0700
> +++ test/linux-2.5.73/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2003-07-17 16:59:17.000000000
> -0700
...
> @@ -1330,7 +1330,8 @@
> }
> } else if (pinfo->onlink && valid_lft) {
> addrconf_prefix_route(&pinfo->prefix, pinfo->prefix_len,
The "pinfo->onlink" part of this if test does not exist
in the sources, so patch application failed.
You're mixing this patch up with other changes in your
tree already.
Please repatch against current 2.6.x sources.
Thanks.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] correct 'discvovery' typo, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.5.73, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.5.73, Krishna Kumar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |