netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.5.73

To: Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.5.73
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 05:17:33 -0700
Cc: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307171716160.9419-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030718.004701.11546819.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307171716160.9419-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ------------------- Patch for prefix list against 2.5.73 ------------

Ok, I tried to apply this, but it had lots of rejects, here
is why.

> diff -ruN linux-2.5.73.org/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 
> test/linux-2.5.73/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> --- linux-2.5.73.org/net/ipv6/addrconf.c      2003-06-22 11:33:17.000000000 
> -0700
> +++ test/linux-2.5.73/net/ipv6/addrconf.c     2003-07-17 16:59:17.000000000 
> -0700
 ...
> @@ -1330,7 +1330,8 @@
>               }
>       } else if (pinfo->onlink && valid_lft) {
>               addrconf_prefix_route(&pinfo->prefix, pinfo->prefix_len,

The "pinfo->onlink" part of this if test does not exist
in the sources, so patch application failed.

You're mixing this patch up with other changes in your
tree already.

Please repatch against current 2.6.x sources.
Thanks.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>