| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.4.21 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Jul 2003 21:46:53 -0700 |
| Cc: | krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200307210155.FAA31320@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3F17245D.9040806@xxxxxxxxxx> <200307210155.FAA31320@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 05:55:04 +0400 (MSD) kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > The patch is not quite complete: except for those two questions, > I forgot to add MTU truncated to its IPv4 value, did nothing > for multicast things (I still cannot figure out, what information is > really useful) and did not add active notifications which would be good > to be made after sysctl parameters are changed. Please let us to use some portable types instead of 'int' :-) It is just minor nit, I otherwise like the whole idea. Why are we limited to arrays of 'u32' or whatever? RTA_PUT() can place arbitrary things into the message and length is given. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.4.21, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] correct 'discvovery' typo, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.4.21, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, Krishna Kumar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |