Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.4.21

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <3F17245D.9040806@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:34:05 -0700), 
Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> have any knowledge of using this new interface. If you prefer, I can split the
> patch for prefix list vs O/M bits so that the former is accepted without any
> issues. Someone else can modify the O/M to suit new needs. Does that sound OK
> with you ?

Yes, please split up the patch.


>  > At least, new RTM_xxx should not be restricted to get such flags.
> 
> That's why I had suggested that we can use RTM_GETLNKINFO with more 
> information,
> like RTA_IFFLAGS, and other things like stats or whatever. That can be done
> easily enough and still be functionally complete. I just don't have any idea
> about this new interface.
> 
> Is this still a problem ?

Hmm, I might miss something.
Anyway, it seems we're reaching consensus.

--yoshfuji