| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TCP IP Offloading Interface |
| From: | Matt Porter <mporter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:37:58 -0700 |
| Cc: | Alan Shih <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030713004818.4f1895be.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; from davem@xxxxxxxxxx on Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 12:48:18AM -0700 |
| References: | <ODEIIOAOPGGCDIKEOPILCEMBCMAA.alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030713004818.4f1895be.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 12:48:18AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On receive side, clever RX buffer flipping tricks are the way > to go and require no protocol changes and nothing gross like > TOE or weird buffer ownership protocols like RDMA requires. > > I've made postings showing how such a scheme can work using a limited > flow cache on the networking card. I don't have a reference handy, > but I suppose someone else does. The following reference should be useful for those following along at home and wondering what the hell this hardware flow cache scheme is: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0306.2/0429.html Regards, -- Matt Porter mporter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patches] invalid nh.raw use after free, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TCP IP Offloading Interface, Matt Porter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TCP IP Offloading Interface, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | RE: TCP IP Offloading Interface, Jordi Ros |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |