| To: | Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding |
| From: | Ralph Doncaster <ralph@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:36:10 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | linux-netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307151115500.6012-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307151115500.6012-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Dan Hollis wrote: > That is exactly what it does. hw tcp checksumming helps a LOT at gbe rates This still doesn't make any sense. The copy from user-space to kernel space does the checksum as far as I recall (unless you use the router-not-host kernel build option). -Ralph |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] Prefix List against 2.5.73, Krishna Kumar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: TCP IP Offloading Interface, Ralph Doncaster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding, Dan Hollis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding, Dan Hollis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |