On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 14:48, Pekka Savola wrote:
On 11 Jul 2003, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
I think that in this particular case, if should have configured your
interface address with 2002:v4:addr::/16, of which subnet anycast router
address would be 2002::.
Here's a valid use for subnet router anycase that isn't working.
Somebody asked me how to set up 6to4, so I did a little testing.
hades:~# ip route add ::/0 via 2002:c058:6301::
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
hades:~# ip route add ::/0 via 2002:c058:6301::1
Unfortunately the first form is what I need:
hades:~# host -t AAAA 6to4.ipv6.funet.fi
6to4.ipv6.funet.fi has AAAA address 2001:708:0:1::624
6to4.ipv6.funet.fi has AAAA address 2002:c058:6301::
Ah ok. It *is* configured with a /16. As far as my host is concerned,
2002:c058:6301:: should be just a unicast address like any other, so
maybe there is a IID==0 check somewhere?
So apparently there really is an inappropriate subnet router anycast
sanity check. Please fix this!
This *may* be caused by another issue too: nexthop's must be given in the
compatible "::18.104.22.168" format, not 2002:xxxx :-(
I sent a patch on over a year or so ago, but it didn't gain that much
I vote for fixing this too. :-)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/