netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked

To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:04:28 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: mika.liljeberg@xxxxxxxxx, <andre@xxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20030711.200357.33143193.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307111358440.27351-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 11 
> Jul 2003 13:59:14 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> 
> > > So, you cannot remove subnet router anycast address from
> > > kernel via this interface; kernel keeps one reference.
> > 
> > .. which is why kernel shouldn't keep *any* reference *at all*!
> 
> No, it is because REQUIRED and UNREMOVABLE anycast address.

Smells like a circular requirement :-)

> I don't think it is good to change this.

That's another issue entirely.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>