| To: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked |
| From: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:04:28 +0300 (EEST) |
| Cc: | mika.liljeberg@xxxxxxxxx, <andre@xxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030711.200357.33143193.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote: > In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307111358440.27351-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 11 > Jul 2003 13:59:14 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > > > > So, you cannot remove subnet router anycast address from > > > kernel via this interface; kernel keeps one reference. > > > > .. which is why kernel shouldn't keep *any* reference *at all*! > > No, it is because REQUIRED and UNREMOVABLE anycast address. Smells like a circular requirement :-) > I don't think it is good to change this. That's another issue entirely. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, Mika Liljeberg |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, Mika Liljeberg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |