| To: | "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops |
| From: | Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:21:49 +0100 |
| Cc: | Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E0102229133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E0102229133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:47:13AM -0700, Feldman, Scott wrote: > Can we get a HAVE_NETDEV_OPS? I'll seriously consider it ... once we have a better idea where this is all going. I'm a big fan of having _shared_ compatibility code rather than something in each driver. Obviously we'll want to share drivers between 2.4 and 2.6. -- "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | From which version, struct sock is changed to the new one?, Ling, Xiaofeng |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |