[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP

To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP
From: Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:22:35 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, paulus@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, fcusack@xxxxxxxxx, dfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, carlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030625091531.5ebed618.shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20030625072602.529AF2C0B9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1056547262.1945.1436.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030625091531.5ebed618.shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> In the long run, the right answer probably is to push the session management
> out of the daemon and into the kernel.  Today the PPPoE code in the kernel
> is only half-brained, it needs pppd to survive.

I would think pppd is the half-brained portion ;->

Placing control protocols in the kernel is plain wrong.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>