netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [rfc] sk_write_space() for atm

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [rfc] sk_write_space() for atm
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 17:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200306250032.h5P0WJsG010081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030624.163517.15237390.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200306250032.h5P0WJsG010081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 20:30:12 -0400

   comments?

This looks ok to me, but I am not well versed in this
area.  For example, if you give a spurious wakeup via
poll() what can happen?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [rfc] sk_write_space() for atm, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: [rfc] sk_write_space() for atm, chas williams
Previous by Thread:  Re: [rfc] sk_write_space() for atm, chas williams
Next by Thread:  Re: [rfc] sk_write_space() for atm, chas williams
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]