Re: [PATCH] missing owner field entry on pppoe /proc

netdev

Re: [PATCH] missing owner field entry on pppoe /proc

To:	shemminger@xxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] missing owner field entry on pppoe /proc
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2003 12:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20030619122024.3d21c0ec.shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
References:	<20030619122024.3d21c0ec.shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

   From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
   Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 12:20:24 -0700

   The /proc file operations for PPPOE is missing an owner entry.
   This means that if someone has /proc file open, it is still
   possible to unload the module.

Applied, thanks.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] missing owner field entry on pppoe /proc, Stephen Hemminger Re: [PATCH] missing owner field entry on pppoe /proc, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] add prefetch to skb_queue_walk, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 2.5.72] mark assert error cases in skbuff unlikely, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] missing owner field entry on pppoe /proc, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Thread:	[PATCH 2.5.72] mark assert error cases in skbuff unlikely, Stephen Hemminger
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]