| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance tests |
| From: | Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:27:50 -0700 |
| Cc: | ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030616.160856.35828947.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030616223714.GB18484@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030616.154401.132900800.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030616230922.GC18484@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030616.160856.35828947.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:08:56PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > It depends upon the first patch that I enclosed. Never mind. :) Such patches don't work very well with patch --dry. Simon- [ Simon Kirby ][ Network Operations ] [ sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ][ NetNation Communications Inc. ] [ Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employer. ] |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.5.71] Fix module owner for bonding driver, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance tests, Simon Kirby |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance tests, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance tests, Simon Kirby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |