| To: | greg@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Jun 2003 20:01:51 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | ltd@xxxxxxxxx, anton@xxxxxxxxx, haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx, hdierks@xxxxxxxxxx, scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx, dwg@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, milliner@xxxxxxxxxx, ricardoz@xxxxxxxxxx, twichell@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030614170848.GA3324@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030613.230850.85410095.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030613.231418.39160686.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030614170848.GA3324@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 10:08:49 -0700 It's someone subscribed to linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx that causes this. Thanks, I've nuked linux_news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, if they resubscribe without contacting me, I'll block future subscription attempts from them. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: decorum, Ralph Doncaster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Make xfrm subsystem optional, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4), Greg KH |
| Next by Thread: | Re: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4), Nivedita Singhvi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |