Re: [PATCH] Make xfrm subsystem optional

["David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>]

   From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
   Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:18:51 +0200
   
   Allocating it at first lookup would be racy (would need a nasty
   spinlock at least). It may be possible at first policy setup, but
   it's not guaranteed you can still get two 32K continuous areas. You
   could fall back to vmalloc I guess.

Andi, you're getting rediculious.  Add a xfrm_whatever_init() call
and allocate the table there.

Oh, I see, we do that already... end of discussion I guess.