[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3c59x

To: chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 3c59x
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, bogdan.costescu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200306101741.h5AHf8sG008844@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030610.103111.26297722.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200306101741.h5AHf8sG008844@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:39:15 -0400
   i was thinking you could do it higher up, like around the hard_start_xmit
   level.  this would create a bit of replicated code, but you could abuse
   the preprocessor a bit i imagine.

3c59x already does this, so now we'd have 4 different copies.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>