[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3c59x

To: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 3c59x
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ak@xxxxxxx, bogdan.costescu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030610171617.GC1959@xxxxxxx>
References: <20030610162342.GB1959@xxxxxxx> <20030610.100209.70199702.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030610171617.GC1959@xxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:16:17 -0400

   On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:02:09AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
   > This means end users don't see the benefit, so I definitely
   > prefer Andi's idea.
   Making every IO a conditional branch?  Ug.
A PIO costs hundreds if not thousands of instructions!
Come on Jeff, get real :-)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>