netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3c59x

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 3c59x
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:16:17 -0400
Cc: ak@xxxxxxx, bogdan.costescu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030610.100209.70199702.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306101801070.26879-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030610162029.GA8168@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030610162342.GB1959@xxxxxxx> <20030610.100209.70199702.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:02:09AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>    From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
>    Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:23:42 -0400
>    
>    I prefer a compile-time test.
> 
> This means end users don't see the benefit, so I definitely
> prefer Andi's idea.

Making every IO a conditional branch?  Ug.

        Jeff




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>