[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Route cache performance under stress

To: chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 09:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200306101142.h5ABgssG004210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030610061010.Y36963@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200306101142.h5ABgssG004210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 07:41:01 -0400

   the bulk (by count) of the traffic seems to be in the 64-95 byte range.

Ok, time to deploy ATM everywhere to replace our IP routers :)
Sorry Chas, I couldn't resist... :)

Reagardless, there are some sites on the net that publish things
like BGP tables and traffic samples that people can use to do
performance testing on new algorithms.  I've read about it in
papers by Vern Paxson (he used it to do his Bro thing) and others.

I don't have a reference handy, anyone?  I think it's called the
IPMA project...

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>