[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Route cache performance under stress

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress
From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 15:10:25 +0200
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030608.050500.28795668.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (David S. Miller's message of "Sun, 08 Jun 2003 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT)")
References: <87wuge59w2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030526.233211.54217447.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <87he70re62.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030608.050500.28795668.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Although, I hope it's not "too similar" to what CEF does because
> undoubtedly Cisco has a bazillion patents in this area.

Most things in this area are patented, and the patents are extremely
fuzzy (e.g. policy-based routing with hierarchical sequence of
decisions has been patented countless times). 8-(

> This is actually an argument for coming up with out own algorithms
> without any knowledge of what CEF does or might do. :(

The branchless variant is not described in the IOS book, and I can't
tell if Cisco routers use it.  If this idea is really novel, we are in
pretty good shape because we no longer use trees, tries or whatever,
but a DFA. 8-)

Further parameters which could be tweaked is the kind of adjacency
information (where to store the L2 information, whether to include the
prefix length in the adjacency record etc.).

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>