netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] xfrm ip6ip6

from [James Morris] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Mitsuru KANDA / 神田 充 <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm ip6ip6
From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 02:06:07 +1000 (EST)
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <87fzmv5ejc.wl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Mitsuru KANDA / [ISO-2022-JP] $B?@ED(B $B=<(B wrote:

> I honestly have to say it is not tested well.

Btw, one simple way to test the xfrm tunneling is to set up a plain ipcomp 
tunnel and run ssh or https over it, which should cause non-compressed 
packets to be sent (they will fail the compressability test).


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] xfrm ip6ip6, James Morris
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] xfrm ip6ip6, James Morris
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]