netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6

from [Venkata Jagana] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6
From: Venkata Jagana <jaganav@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:38:01 -0700
Cc: vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ajtuomin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lpetande@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jagana@xxxxxxxxxx, kumarkr@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030531.000319.114704530.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: IBM Corp
References: <20030424132559.GA15894@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305301712300.3584-200000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030531.000319.114704530.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
When we have tested this recently (just two months ago), we found only two bugs but MIPL has already fixed those in their development version. How long before have you tested this and what problems have you encountered in your test? 

Thanks,
Venkat

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki /  wrote:


In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305301712300.3584-200000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 30 May 
2003 17:34:40 +0300 (EEST)), Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> says:


here is a patch that fixes CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES and allows overriding
normal routes with source address specific ones. This is for example
needed in MIPv6 for handling the traffic to and from a mobile node's home
address correctly.


Let us test the patch.  It seemed buggy when USAGI tested before.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  netlink tester program, Randy.Dunlap
Next by Date:  Re: netlink tester program, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Next by Thread:  [patch]: ipv6 tunnel for MIPv6, Ville Nuorvala
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]